Ghost Vacuum

Top Performing Decklists

Deck Creator Record Best Finish
Dimir Midrange o_danielakos 9-0 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12763156
Dimir Bounce mogged 5-0 1st in MTGO Standard Last Chance #12761364
Red Deck Wins comrade1312 5-0 2nd in MTGO Standard Last Chance #12761364
Golgari Midrange scooby_snacks 5-0 None
Golgari Midrange slaxx 5-0 None

Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)

Win Rate Impact
-0.4%
vs average deck
Top Table Win Rate
74.7%
placement-weighted
Meta Trend
+4.9%
recent vs earlier
Sample Size
354
decks
Tournament Results
91
1st place
162
top 8
Average Copies
1.7
per deck

Meta Performance Analysis

Ghost Vacuum ranks #48 out of approximately 320 cards in raw efficiency (top 15%).

Game Impact Factor
80.66
How much this card influences game outcomes
Color Differential
+18.26%

Colorless average: 51.9%

Performance compared to other Colorless cards

Based on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Ghost Vacuum is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.

Recommended number of copies: 3

Win Rate Timeline

Card Efficiency Analysis

Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
70.0
Win percentage points per mana invested
Relative Efficiency
0.99x
Compared to average cards of same mana value

Performance Efficiency: 32.04 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)

At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 70.9%. Ghost Vacuum has a win rate of 70.0%, making it 1.2% worse than other 1-mana cards.

Top Performing Partners

Card Name Type Deck Count Win Rate 1st Places
Harvester of Misery Creature — Spirit 6 62.2% 1
Final Showdown Instant 6 61.6% 1
Lightning Helix Instant 5 60.6% 1
Karn, Living Legacy Legendary Planeswalker — Karn 5 60.6% 1
Quintorius Kand Legendary Planeswalker — Quintorius 5 60.6% 1
The Stone Brain Legendary Artifact 9 53.5% 1
Dreams of Steel and Oil Sorcery 6 51.0% 1
Urabrask's Forge Artifact 6 50.5% 1
Destroy Evil Instant 6 50.5% 1
Lithomantic Barrage Sorcery 6 50.5% 1

Card Synergy Analysis

Cards that perform better with Ghost Vacuum than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.

Card Name Type Mana Decks Win Rate Together Win Rate Apart Synergy Score
Authority of the Consuls Enchantment 1 5 92.3% 69.0% +23.3%
Marang River Regent Creature — Dragon 6 6 87.5% 72.2% +15.3%
Split Up Sorcery 3 5 84.6% 69.9% +14.7%
Glissa Sunslayer Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Zombie Elf 3 5 91.7% 80.8% +10.8%
The End Instant 4 6 82.1% 71.4% +10.8%
Lumbering Worldwagon Artifact — Vehicle 3 5 86.4% 76.3% +10.1%
Ride's End Instant 5 5 80.0% 70.8% +9.2%
Scavenging Ooze Creature — Ooze 2 5 80.8% 71.6% +9.2%
Abrade Instant 2 5 88.2% 79.1% +9.1%
Bounce Off Instant 1 11 86.4% 77.5% +8.9%

Top Archetypes

Archetype Deck Count % of Archetype Win Rate
Dimir Midrange 1367 66.9% 50.0%
Gruul Aggro 602 29.2% 46.4%
Golgari Midrange 442 57.3% 44.5%
Dimir Bounce 397 81.5% 52.4%
Red Deck Wins 386 28.8% 50.7%

Statistics Explanation

Statistic Description Formula
Win Rate Impact How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks)
Top Table Win Rate A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight)
Meta Trend Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period)
Confidence Factor A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). log10(Number of decks + 1)
Average Copies The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks)
Card Synergy Score Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates)
Raw Efficiency Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. (Win rate) / (Mana value)
Relative Efficiency How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value)
Performance Efficiency Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value)
Game Impact Factor A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100)
Color Differential How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. Win rate - Average win rate for same color

All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.